Ishaque Eqbal vs Edoardo Cherie Ligniere Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W L W W L
Form
L W L W L W W L W LH2H: Eqbal 1 - 0 Ligniere
They have played 2 sets in total, with Eqbal winning 2 and Ligniere winning 0. The last match between Eqbal and Ligniere was at the M25 Addis Ababa, 22-05-2024, First, Clay with Ishaque Eqbal getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ishaque Eqbal | 1 |
| Edoardo Cherie Ligniere | 0 |
M25 Addis Ababa(22-05-2024)
7
5
6
3
| Eqbal | Stats | Ligniere |
|---|---|---|
| 62% (13-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 877 | Ranking | N/A |
| 768 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 27 | Age | 20 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 56% (91-72) | Career Total W/L | 50% (29-29) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rinderknech VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Gibert VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Ishaque Eqbal
Player
Edoardo Cherie Ligniere
46%
(
26 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
96%
(
25 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:52:0 | Average Match Time | 1:52:0 |
| 46% (26/57) | 1st Serve % | 60% (48/80) |
| 96% (25/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (29/48) |
| 55% (17/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (16/32) |
| 33% (3/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 44% (35/80) | Return Points Win % | 26% (15/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ishaque Eqbal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Chirag Duhan
Player
Ishaque Eqbal
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ishaque Eqbal
Player
Raghav Jaisinghani
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ishaque Eqbal
Player
Maan Kesarwani
58%
(
11 of
19)
1st Serve %
54%
(
14 of
26)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
100%
(
11 of
11)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
28
Total Points Won
17
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryotaro Taguchi
Player
Ishaque Eqbal
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ishaque Eqbal
Player
Yash Yadav
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
20 of
34)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ishaque Eqbal
Player
Rishi Reddy
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
67
|
1-6 6-4 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ishaque Eqbal
Player
Suraj R Prabodh
46%
(
31 of
68)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
3
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Ishaque Eqbal
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ishaque Eqbal
Player
Rishi Reddy
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Woobin Shin
Player
Ishaque Eqbal
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Edoardo Cherie Ligniere Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Edoardo Cherie Ligniere
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
78%
(
43 of
55)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edoardo Cherie Ligniere
Player
Louis Van Herck
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Edoardo Cherie Ligniere
Player
Semen Batin
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yvo Panak
Player
Edoardo Cherie Ligniere
81%
(
50 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edoardo Cherie Ligniere
Player
Unknown Player
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
50
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Edoardo Cherie Ligniere
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (91/72) | Win/Loss | 50% (29/29) |
| 55% (197/163) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (65/64) |
| 53% (1770/1600) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (607/578) |
| 56% (74/57) | Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) |
| 53% (17/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (26/22) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 372 | Aces Total | 21 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 514 | Total Double Faults | 74 |
| 1:26:39 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 374.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 32.86 |
| 60% (5605/9359) | 1st Serve % | 65% (771/1192) |
| 66% (3690/5605) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (495/771) |
| 47% (1783/3754) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (204/421) |
| 48% (470/987) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (60/115) |
| 43% (3908/9163) | Return Points Win % | 41% (474/1143) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 56% (91/71) | Futures W/L | 52% (29/27) |
| 55% (87/157) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (29/58) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (20/38) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (4/7) |
| 54% (20/37) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (6/13) |
| 89% (90/80) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (30/24) |
| 11% (90/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (30/6) |
| 15% (72/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (28/5) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
